MODULE_T – Real-Time Target Simulation in Any Environment

MODULE_T Real-Time Target Simulation in Any Environment – Always Precise, Always Dynamic
Discover MODULE_T – the autonomous target drone system for training, simulation, and tactical operations in open environments. It enables fully autonomous navigation without GPS, complex manoeuvres, swarm flights, and live integration into training and command centre systems. At the core of the innovation is a two-stage visual navigation pipeline: Priority 1 uses extremely fast landmark-based localisation (<10 ms), Priority 2 falls back on robust image-to-image matching (VPR) when needed.
Seamless Integration into Existing Systems
Precise Navigation without GPS in Open Environments
Suitable Application Areas
Target Drone – Live and Seamlessly Integrated
Seamless Integration into Existing Systems
MODULE_T integrates seamlessly into existing training and simulation systems (Tactical Training Systems, Command & Control Software). RGB and thermal video streams are transmitted via RTSP and automatically detected via ONVIF. Sensor data (e.g. position, velocity, or swarm status values) flows in via MQTT and OPC UA – ideal for real-time alarms, pop-ups, and dynamic scenario adjustments. The drone is fully IP-based and compatible with common platforms such as Milestone, Genetec, and other command centres – without any additional proprietary solutions.
Precise Navigation without GPS
Precise Navigation without GPS
Precise Navigation without GPS in Open Environments
MODULE_T achieves reproducible flight paths with minimal deviation – even in large open areas under GPS interference (jamming, spoofing, or signal loss). This is made possible by a two-stage visual navigation pipeline:
Priority 1 (Landmark-based, 80–90% of cases): Extraction of ORB features in a bearing-guided ROI (40–60% of image area), table-based lookup (<1 ms), and PnP pose estimation. Priority 2 (Fallback, only when landmarks are absent): Global image matching via FAISS (IVF-PQ + HNSW) with AnyLoc descriptors, optionally refined by SuperPoint + LightGlue.
A Decision Margin (difference between the best and second-best match) adaptively determines which path becomes active. The offline-prepared ground database (approx. 700 MB) contains lookup tables, a FAISS index, and visibility filters, and resides entirely onboard (e.g. Jetson Orin). Waypoints and complex manoeuvres are planned in a user-defined 3D grid and executed via ArduPilot/Pixhawk 6X. Manual takeover is possible at any time.
Excellently Suited for Training and Simulation Missions in Open Environments
Suitable Application Areas
MODULE_T is excellently suited for daily training and simulation missions in open environments, military training grounds, and tactical scenarios. Typical applications include:
- Complex manoeuvre simulation (evasive manoeuvres, high-speed targets)
- Swarm flights for realistic threat replication
- Target acquisition and tracking training for air defence systems
- GPS-denied operations in contested environments (jamming training)
Autonomous target drone systems like MODULE_T dramatically increase training efficiency by enabling realistic, repeatable scenarios without personnel requirements and without GPS dependency – a trend confirmed in current studies on UAV swarm navigation. The system is immediately ready for deployment in modern training environments.
Excellent for Daily Routine Inspections
Scientific Foundation and Comparison
The navigation technologies of MODULE_T are based on established methods of visual robotics and modern VPR approaches:
- Two-stage visual navigation (landmarks + image matching) for minimal latency with maximum robustness
- Bearing-guided ROI Selection to reduce computational load by 35–55%
- Lookup tables & FAISS indices (IVF-PQ + HNSW) for O(1) access to 10 million reference images
- AnyLoc / DINOv2-based global descriptors for perspective-invariant matching
Further reading:
- Chang, Y. et al. (2023). A review of UAV autonomous navigation in GPS-denied environments. Robotics and Autonomous Systems.
- Power, W. et al. (2020). Autonomous Navigation for Drone Swarms in GPS-Denied Environments Using Structured Learning. Sensors.
- Arandjelovic et al. (2016). NetVLAD: CNN architecture for weakly supervised place recognition. CVPR.
- Johnson et al. (2019). FAISS: A library for efficient similarity search. Facebook AI Research.
- Sarlin et al. (2020). SuperPoint & LightGlue: Keypoint detection and matching. CVPR.
- Arshid, K. et al. (2025). Toward Autonomous UAV Swarm Navigation: A Review of Trajectory Design Paradigms. Sensors.
- Qamar, S. et al. (2022). Autonomous Drone Swarm Navigation and Multi-target Tracking in 3D Environments. arXiv preprint.
MODULE_T Compared to Market Leaders
The table is based on publicly available specifications (as of 2026), manufacturer data, and industry comparisons.
| Criterion | MODULE_T (Koller Lech-Tec) | Traditional GPS Target Drone (e.g. Kratos BQM-167 / Meggitt) | Autonomous Swarm Target Drone (e.g. UAV Navigation-based systems) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Focus | Autonomous target simulation with two-stage visual navigation (landmarks + VPR fallback) | Classic target simulation (mostly GPS-dependent) for air defence training | Highly autonomous swarm and target operations with limited GPS independence |
| Autonomy Level | Semi- to fully autonomous (waypoint grid, adaptive algorithm selection via Decision Margin) | Semi-autonomous (predefined paths, GPS-assisted) | Highly autonomous (swarm formation, but often still GPS-assisted) |
| Navigation Method | Visual: ORB + landmark lookup (<1 ms) / FAISS + AnyLoc (7–15 ms), VIO, edge computing | Primarily GPS + inertial (IMU), limited backup sensors | Visual-inertial SLAM + neural networks, partial relative navigation |
| Positioning Accuracy | Low deviation (reproducible in GPS-denied conditions) | Metre-level accuracy (strongly GPS-dependent) | High (optimised for swarm use, approx. 1–2 m without GPS) |
| GPS-Denied Capability | Yes (fully, robust in open environments, forest, water, desert – fallback active) | Limited (failure leads to mission abort or drift) | Partial (swarm relative navigation possible) |
| Latency per Frame | 5–16 ms (60+ Hz possible) | 30–60 ms (camera-dependent) | 20–50 ms (computationally intensive) |
| Protection / Collision Resistance | Yes (obstacle avoidance, dynamic swarm safety) | No (no real collision avoidance in swarm) | Yes (360° avoidance, but often limited to tight formations) |
| Sensors / Payload | RGB + thermal camera, onboard database (700 MB), swarm status, RTSP/MQTT/OPC UA | Standard camera / radar reflector, limited sensors | Multi-camera, swarm coordination sensors (no thermal focus) |
| Integration | Strong (training command centres, C2 systems, MQTT/OPC UA, RTSP) | Good (standard military interfaces) | Strong (swarm management systems, real-time data feed) |
| Flight Time per Mission | 20–40 min (depending on payload and manoeuvre intensity) | 30–60 min (typical for target drones) | 15–30 min (swarm deployment with high dynamics) |
| Use Case Strengths | Realistic GPS-denied swarm and manoeuvre training – even without landmarks (water, forest) | Classic static / GPS-assisted target training | Swarm training in controlled environments |
MODULE_T surpasses traditional systems particularly in GPS-denied scenarios and genuine swarm intelligence – ideal for modern, realistic training requirements.
Would you like to experience MODULE_T live or adapt it for your training centre? Contact us – we turn any drone into an intelligent, autonomous target.
Request Documents
Error: Contact form not found.
Last updated: March 2026